翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Central Air Defense Force ・ Central Air Force Museum ・ Central Aircraft Company ・ Central Aircraft Manufacturing Company ・ Central Airlines ・ Central Airport ・ Central Airport (film) ・ Central Aisle Ridge ・ Central Alabama ・ Central Alabama Community College ・ Central Alaskan Yup'ik language ・ Central Alaskan Yup'ik people ・ Central Albania ・ Central Albany Revitalization Area ・ Central Alberta ・ Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission) ・ Central Alberta Hockey League ・ Central Algonquian languages ・ Central Almond ・ Central Amalgamated Workers' Union ・ Central America ・ Central America (disambiguation) ・ Central America (game) ・ Central America bioregion ・ Central America Resource Center ・ Central America Volcanic Arc ・ Central America-4 Border Control Agreement ・ Central America-4 passport ・ Central American & Caribbean Tennis Confederation ・ Central American Adventist University Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission) ： ウィキペディア英語版 Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission) ''Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission)'', () 2 S.C.R. 489, is a leading Human Rights decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court expanded on the concept of accommodation up to undue hardship first established in ''Ontario Human Rights Commission and O'Malley v. Simpsons-Sears Ltd.'' (1985) and provided a set of factors to consider when evaluating undue hardship. ==Background== Jim Christie was an employee at an Albertan Dairy farm since 1980. In 1983 he joined the Worldwide Church of God and as part of his observance of the faith he had to take a number of days off work. The Dairy farm was initially accommodating, but when he tried to take off a Monday, which was the busiest day of the week, they refused to let him off and told him that if he did not show up to work he would be fired. Christie did not show up on Monday and, when he returned from work on Tuesday, his job was filled with a new employee. Christie submitted a complaint under the ''Individual's Rights Protection Act'' for dismissal based on religious grounds. The Board of Inquiry ordered that Christie be compensated for lost wages. On appeal, the Court held that attendance on Mondays was a bona fide occupational requirement and therefore a valid ground for dismissal. The issues before the Supreme Court were whether the Dairy farm could justify the dismissal on the basis that the requirement that Christie work on Mondays is a bona fide occupational requirement under section 7(3) of the ''Act'' and, if not, whether it still open to the respondent to demonstrate that it had accommodated the complainant's religious beliefs up to the point of undue hardship and if so, whether the Dairy farm in fact reasonably accommodate the complainant's religious beliefs. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.